A capitalist society’s political context involves characteristics like: freedom to start a business, low taxes, and minimal government intervention. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.įor technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). The context and culture of the activity are as important as the experience itself. Political contexts describe what you need to know about the politics of a situation. If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. You can help adding them by using this form. We have no bibliographic references for this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about. This allows to link your profile to this item. If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.įor technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-9_7. You can help correct errors and omissions. Szolovits, P., Hawkinson, L., and Martin, W.A.: ‘An overview of OWL, a language for knowledge representation,’ Proceedings of the Workshop on Natural Language for Interaction with Data Bases, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria also available as LCS TM-86 (June 1977), MIT, Cambridge, Mass.All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. We discuss how self-tracking tools can be designed to align data visualizations with individuals perceived boundaries to aid in data interpretation. Swartout, W.: ‘A digitalis therapy advisor with explanations,’ Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, Mass. We propose the concept of bounded situational context (BSC) to encapsulate how individuals define the boundaries of disruption within their data based on external and internal contexts. Empirical findings support the theoretical argument that the cultural group is a critical factor that needs to be studied in the context of situational. and Sacks, H.: ‘Opening up closing,’ Semiotica 8 (1973). The concept of environment is referred to here as a series. and Abelson, R.: Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ. The environment is the situational and physical context in which information seeking takes place. ![]() Moore, J.A., Levin, J.A., and Mann, W.C.: ‘A goal-oriented model of human dialogue,’ American Journal of Computational Linguistics, Microfiche 67 (1977). ![]() Minsky, M.: ‘A framework for representing knowledge,’ in: Winston (ed.), Visual Information Processing, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. ![]() Hawkinson, L.: ‘The representation of concepts in OWL,’ Advance Papers of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Tbilisi, Georgia, USSE (September 1975). Context is the situation, circumstances, or specific setting in which an event occurs. It is one of the types of context that influence communication. Grosz, B.: ‘The representation and use of focus in a system for understanding dialogs,’ Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, Mass. Situational context describes the reason why something is occurring and the appropriate behavior and actions associated with the situation. 2973 ( January 1975 ), Bolt, Baranek and Newman, Inc., Cambridge, Mass.ĭeutsch, B.G.: ‘The structure of task oriented dialogs,’ Proceedings IEEE Speech Symposium, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pa. Brown, G.P.: ‘A framework for processing dialogue,’ LCS TR-182 (June 1977), Laboratory for Computer Science, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.īruce, B.C.: ‘Belief systems and language understanding,’ BBN Report No.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |